ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing Human-Robot Compatibility in Shoulder Exoskeletons: Passive Joint Optimization of PP
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experimental Evaluation of Kinematic Compatibility in Three Upper Limb Exoskeleton Configurations Using Interface Force and Torque.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the kinematic performance of two shoulder rehabilitation exoskeleton configurations to address the critical challenge of human-robot compatibility. Utilizing Hunt's mobility formula and task-specific Jacobian analysis, we developed a closed-chain kinematic model integrating transient glenohumeral joint dynamics, validated through force/torque measurements and ANOVA statistical comparisons. The PPRRRP configuration, featuring orthogonally distributed passive prismatic joints, demonstrated superior performance: 40-60% lower interaction forces (F¯total=2.66 N), near-isotropic manipulability (ellipsoid axis ratio < 1.5), and 60% reduced operational torque (T¯total=0.18 N·m) compared to RRRUP's universal joint design. These results establish passive DOF optimization as a viable alternative to actuator-dense systems, diverging from conventional approaches like ARMin-III that prioritize active control. The originality lies in bridging theoretical configuration synthesis with empirical validation, offering a replicable framework for compatibility assessment. This work advances rehabilitation robotics by demonstrating that mechanical transparency-achieved through strategic passive joint allocation-enhances natural movement synergy without compromising stability, proposing hypotheses on energy efficiency and isotropy-fatigue correlations for future exploration. Clinical translation and adaptive impedance control integration are identified as critical next steps to optimize patient-specific rehabilitation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.