ArticleAdvances in respiratory medicine2025
Cryptic Circulation and Co-Infections of Endemic Human Coronaviruses During the First Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil.
Article in Advances in respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the global focus on SARS-CoV-2 overshadowed the epidemiology of other respiratory pathogens. This study aimed to characterize the circulation of endemic human coronaviruses (HCoVs) in Brazil. We retrospectively analyzed results from 22,472 PCR tests for HCoVs (from 5183 patients) and 601,278 tests for SARS-CoV-2 (from 475,856 patients) between November 2019 and June 2021. HCoVs were detected in 160 patients (3.09%), with HCoV-NL63 as the most frequent species. HCoV circulation was intermittent, with positivity peaks up to 4% but also periods of up to six months with an absence of detections in 2020, contrasting with the sustained high positivity of SARS-CoV-2 (22.37%). Co-infections were frequent: 26.25% of HCoV-positive patients were co-infected with at least one other respiratory pathogen, most commonly Rhinovirus/Enterovirus, and cases involving up to five pathogens were observed, seven patients had co-infections between HCoVs and SARS-CoV-2. These findings reveal the persistent, often cryptic, circulation of HCoVs during the pandemic and highlight their role as key components in complex multi-pathogen infections. This underscores the critical importance of implementing comprehensive molecular diagnostic panels in routine respiratory surveillance to ensure accurate etiology, guide appropriate clinical management, and fully assess the public health burden of non-SARS-CoV-2 coronaviruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.