ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025
Let's Talk aBOT Scam Online Survey Completions in Health Behavior Research: Tutorial With Case Studies, Practical Guidance, and a Checklist for Researchers.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Social Media Use Among People Living with Chronic Pain: Cross-Sectional Study of Associated Factors.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOnline data collection can reach large populations efficiently and cost-effectively. However, the increase in bots and scammers (ie, person- or software-based fraudulent completions) completing online surveys raises data integrity issues and wastes scarce research resources.
objectiveThis paper aims to describe case studies and experiences in which bot or scam completions of online surveys occurred within the health behavior field (specifically physical activity and nutrition). Lessons learned and a checklist of strategies to assist researchers before, during, and after data collection to reduce the incidence of and identify bot or scam completions are provided.
methodsFour diverse case studies are presented from studies that used online recruitment and data collection methods for cross-sectional surveys by parents about children's screen time, cross-sectional surveys by adults about transport-related physical activity, qualitative interviews for a proposed trauma-informed physical activity program for female victim-survivors of intimate partner violence, and the Australian component of a large multicountry prospective study targeting university students. The strategies used to identify and prevent bot or scam online survey completions are explored.
resultsHigh levels (7%-80%) of suspected bot or scam completions were identified in a number of these studies. Participant characteristics and outcome variables were significantly different between included and excluded participants (eg, excluded responses had a higher percentage of male parents and children, higher social media use, and lower physical activity guideline adherence). The learnings from these case studies and the wider literature are combined to create a checklist of strategies that researchers can use to prevent and identify bot or scam completions. These include strategies before data collection (when creating study collateral), during survey design and development (including the use of inbuilt platform functions and the design of the survey questions and structure), following data collection (indicators of potential bot or scam completions), and recommendations for reporting of bots or scams.
conclusionsThe checklist, based on the included case studies and wider literature, can be used to help researchers who use online recruitment and data collection methods at each stage, from planning and conducting through to analyzing and reporting their findings. Researchers should include several steps to prevent and identify fraudulent survey responses when creating surveys and completing data cleaning. This checklist should also be considered in grant applications and ethics applications. This will provide greater confidence in the research findings and reduce unnecessary waste of research time and resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.