ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Older women's lived experience of ageism: Breast cancer screening beyond the targeted age range.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAgeism has been described as a form of prejudice of one age group against another and is experienced in a range of ways. Little is known about the impact of ageism on the health and well-being of older women. Interacting within the healthcare system becomes more complex with age. This occurs because of increased comorbidity and changing perceptions of the ageing body.
objectivesThis study aimed to explore the concept of ageism by reviewing older women's perceptions and experiences of accessing breast cancer screening.
designDrawing on data gathered by the same researchers, this study utilises a secondary qualitative analysis of primary data.
methodsThis study draws on a purposive sample of 60 women aged ⩾75 years who participated in an Australia-wide study conducted in 2022. In-depth individual interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and imported into NVivo software (Version 15) to enable thematic analysis. Secondary analysis drew on a theoretical lens of ageing together with researcher reflection of ageism in society.
resultsWomen in the study reported experiencing changes in their interaction with and perceptions of healthcare based on age. Perceptions of ageism were grouped into theoretical themes relating to micro, meso and macro concepts of ageism. Thematic headings included: ageing with self-determination and autonomy; meeting the changing health needs of older women and the invisible generation. Generational differences, health system experiences, societal influences and use of technology and online platforms were discussed. Results indicate that ageism may be based on both perception and experience. The impact on health and well-being of women aged ⩾75 years was variable and often modified by associated peer groups.
conclusionIdentifying and describing the multiple layers of ageism presents healthcare providers with an opportunity to understand how ageism is experienced by older women. This has implications for effective communication and care. Health messages designed to reach older women must be cognizant of both implicit and explicit forms of ageism. Establishing trust and avoiding reliance on online platforms as sources of information are important for this age group. Health promotion and prevention initiatives based on age-related criteria may contribute to notions of ageism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.