Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41439380›Full record

Observational studyJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2026

Characterizing Medicare Medication Therapy Management program enrollees with central nervous system-active polypharmacy.

Anna Hung, Lauren E Wilson, Valerie A Smith, Richard Erickson, Kelli Tharpe, Nicole Brandt, Timothy S Anderson, Oliver Valdez, Melissa Castora-Binkley, Juliessa Pavon and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterizing treatment initiation with central nervous system-active polypharmacy among adults with dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anna HungDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Lauren E WilsonDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Valerie A SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Richard EricksonPatient representative, Bloomington, MN.
Kelli TharpeCaregiver partner with California State University, Hayward, CA.
Nicole BrandtUniversity of Maryland School of Pharmacy Lamy Center on Drug Therapy and Aging, Baltimore.
Timothy S AndersonDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Oliver ValdezPharmacy Quality Alliance, Alexandria, VA.
Melissa Castora-BinkleyPharmacy Quality Alliance, Alexandria, VA.
Juliessa PavonDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Susan N HastingsDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Matthew L MaciejewskiDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Caroline E SloanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Funding

Resource Core 3 - Metabolomics CoreP30AG028716 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Virginia B Kraus · 2006 to 2026
$24.6M
Deprescribing Decision-Making using Machine Learning Individualized Treatment Rules to Improve CNS PolypharmacyR01AG088214 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JULIESSA M PAVON · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
Optimizing prescribing decisions for hospitalized older adults with chronic conditionsK76AG074878 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Timothy S Anderson · 2022 to 2026
$1.2M
Improving medication adherence and disease control for patients with multimorbidity: the role of price transparency toolsK23AG076889 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Caroline Ellen Sloan · 2023 to 2026
$717k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG076889NIA NIH HHS K76 AG074878NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028716NIA NIH HHS R01 AG088214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program uses comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) and targeted medication reviews to address medication-related problems in older adults. One such problem is central nervous system (CNS)-active polypharmacy, which is associated with impaired cognition and falls in older adults. To date, little is known about the prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy among MTM enrollees and how they might differ from MTM enrollees without CNS-active polypharmacy; such insights would be helpful to MTM programs developing interventions to reduce CNS-active polypharmacy.

objectiveTo (1) estimate the prevalence of MTM enrollees with CNS-active polypharmacy in a nationwide cohort and (2) compare patient characteristics and MTM service use of MTM enrollees with CNS-active polypharmacy vs without.

methodsCross-sectional, observational study of 2019-2021 Medicare 5% fee-for-service data linked to 2020-2021 MTM data. Patient characteristics and MTM use were compared between MTM enrollees with and without CNS-active polypharmacy.

resultsAmong 38,733 MTM enrollees in 2021, 4,144 (10.7%) experienced CNS-active polypharmacy. Compared with those without CNS-active polypharmacy, the CNS-active polypharmacy cohort was more likely to be male (72% vs 55%, standardized mean difference [SMD] = 34.7%), be dually enrolled in Medicaid (42% vs 24%, SMD = 41.1%), and have greater comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Score of 6.0 vs 5.0, SMD = 13.2%). The CNS-active polypharmacy cohort also had more prior-year health care utilization, such as being more likely to have an inpatient stay (37.5% vs 29.0%, SMD = 18.1%) or emergency department visit (53.7% vs 43.0%, SMD = 21.6%), as well as number of outpatient visits (7.0 vs 5.0, SMD = 20.8%) and number of unique prescription drugs (21.0 vs 15.0, SMD = 91.9%). The number of targeted medication reviews received was greater in the CNS-active polypharmacy cohort, but a lower proportion (35% vs 39%) participated in a CMR.

conclusionsMore than 1 in 10 MTM enrollees experience CNS-active polypharmacy, which is higher than the general Medicare fee-for-service beneficiary population. MTM enrollees with CNS-active polypharmacy are more likely to be male, dually enrolled in Medicaid, and with greater comorbidity burden and prior-year use of health care and medications, suggesting that interventions for this population may need to account for additional clinical and socioeconomic needs. Despite being at greater risk of adverse drug events including impaired cognition and falls, just over one-third of MTM enrollees with CNS-active polypharmacy participate in a CMR, suggesting opportunity for more targeted outreach and intervention by MTM programs, Part D plan sponsors, and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System AgentsMedicare Part DMedication Therapy ManagementPolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesCentral Nervous System Agents

Identifiers

PMID41439380
PMCPMC12728812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.