Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41439351›Full record

ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society

Early Stent Removal at Bedside Decreases Urinary Tract Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Monocentric Prospective Study.

François Audenet, Adrien Panis, Guillaume Fraisse, Charles Dariane, Sophie Hurel, Lucile Amrouche, Dany Anglicheau, Christophe Legendre, Arnaud Mejean, Marc-Olivier Timsit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

François AudenetDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Adrien PanisDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Guillaume FraisseDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Charles DarianeDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Sophie HurelDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Lucile AmroucheDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Dany AnglicheauDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Christophe LegendreDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Arnaud MejeanDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Marc-Olivier TimsitDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring kidney transplantation, the use of a ureteral stent reduces the risk of major urological complications (MUC). However, it is associated with infectious complications and usually requires a second procedure to be removed. The goal of this pilot study was to evaluate the impact of early ureteral stent removal at bedside.

methodsWe prospectively included all consecutive kidney transplant recipients at our center between May 2020 and May 2021. During the first 6 months, all consecutive patients had routine removal of the ureteral stent as an outpatient procedure (Group 1). During the last 6 months, all patients had early removal of the ureteral stent at bedside before leaving the hospital, using a grasper-integrated single-use flexible cystoscope (Group 2). The primary endpoint was feasibility and patient satisfaction. Secondary endpoints were rate of urinary tract infections (UTI) and major complications.

resultsOverall, 151 patients were included, 84 in Group 1 and 67 in Group 2. The characteristics of the two groups were similar. There was no failure of the bedside early stent removal procedure, with a mean overall satisfaction score of 9/10 (rank: 4-10). The rate of MUC was similar in the two groups. In multivariate analysis, early removal of the ureteral stent was a significant predictor of a lower risk of UTI (OR = 0.49; IC95% [0.23; 0.98]; p = 0.047).

conclusionEarly bedside ureteral stent removal was feasible, with a high satisfaction rate and a lower risk of UTI without a significant increase of MUC.

Indexed as

Device RemovalKidney TransplantationStentsUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTransplant RecipientsUreterearly removalflexible cystoscopykidney transplantationureteral stenturinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID41439351
PMCPMC13070015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.