Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41439261›Full record

ReviewDigital discovery2026

Deep learning methods for 2D material electronic properties.

Artem Mishchenko, Anupam Bhattacharya, Xiangwen Wang, Henry Kelbrick Pentz, Yihao Wei, Qian Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Artem MishchenkoDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester Manchester UK artem.mishchenko@manchester.ac.uk anupam.bhattacharya@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-5664
Anupam BhattacharyaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester Manchester UK artem.mishchenko@manchester.ac.uk anupam.bhattacharya@manchester.ac.uk.
Xiangwen WangDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester Manchester UK artem.mishchenko@manchester.ac.uk anupam.bhattacharya@manchester.ac.uk.
Henry Kelbrick PentzDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester Manchester UK artem.mishchenko@manchester.ac.uk anupam.bhattacharya@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2752-4573
Yihao WeiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester Manchester UK artem.mishchenko@manchester.ac.uk anupam.bhattacharya@manchester.ac.uk.
Qian YangDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester Manchester UK artem.mishchenko@manchester.ac.uk anupam.bhattacharya@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores the impact of deep learning (DL) techniques on understanding and predicting electronic structures in two-dimensional (2D) materials. We highlight unique computational challenges posed by 2D materials and discuss how DL approaches - such as physics-aware models, generative AI, and inverse design - have significantly improved predictions of critical electronic properties, including band structures, density of states, and quantum transport phenomena. Through selected case studies, we illustrate how DL methods accelerate discoveries in emergent quantum phenomena, topology, superconductivity, and autonomous materials exploration. Finally, we outline promising future directions, stressing the need for robust data standardization and advocating for integrated frameworks that combine theoretical modeling, DL methods, and experimental validations.

Identifiers

PMID41439261
PMCPMC12720248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.