Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41439245›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Proton radiography interpretation with artificial intelligence for treatment deviation detection in proton therapy.

Giuliano Perotti Bernardini, Arthur Galapon, Gabriel Guterres Marmitt, Jeffrey Free, Peter van Ooijen, Johannes Langendijk, Stefan Both

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giuliano Perotti BernardiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
Arthur GalaponDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
Gabriel Guterres MarmittDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jeffrey FreeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
Peter van OoijenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
Johannes LangendijkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
Stefan BothDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Patient setup errors, anatomical changes, and uncertainties in proton range estimation degrade dose conformity in proton therapy. Adaptive proton therapy (APT) mitigates these deviations by monitoring and adjusting treatment plans. Proton radiography (PR) offers direct proton range information, making it a promising method to detect such deviations. In this study, we developed and evaluated an artificial intelligence (AI) PR tool for automated interpretation and classification of treatment deviations. Materials and methods: Computed Tomography (CT) scans from 32 head-and-neck cancer patients were synthetically modified to simulate setup errors (±2-4 mm), calibration curve errors (±3-5% for fat/soft tissue, ±7-11% for bone), and anatomical changes (±2-12 mm mimicking weight variations). PR simulations were performed using OpenREGGUI to generate integral depth dose (IDD) curves and range shift maps (RSMs) across 260 × 260 mm Results: The CNN classified treatment deviations within one second per image. On the synthetic dataset, it achieved 97% precision, 92% recall, 93% F1-score, and 92% F2-score. On the clinical validation set, it maintained high performance metrics: 86% precision, 88% recall, 86% F1-score, and 87% F2-score, demonstrating strong generalization to clinical scenarios. Conclusions: The AI-enhanced PR tool enables fast, automated detection of treatment deviations in proton therapy, supporting its integration into APT workflows and online plan adaptation for improved quality assurance.

Indexed as

Adaptive proton therapyDeep learning image classificationImage-based quality assuranceProton radiographyProton range uncertaintyTreatment verification

Identifiers

PMID41439245
PMCPMC12720023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.