Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41439227›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Bullying victimization, suicidal behavior, and help-seeking in Chinese adolescents: a legal-psychological Study of resilience and responsibility.

Xianyun Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xianyun GeSchool of Law, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bullying victimization is a significant public health concern among adolescents, with profound psychological and behavioral consequences. Grounded in an ecological and ethical framework, this study connects psychological mechanisms with the moral and institutional responsibilities involved in protecting adolescents' wellbeing. It examines the associations between bullying victimization, suicidal behavior, help-seeking attitudes, and resilient coping among a sample of 987 middle school students (aged 12-15) in China. Additionally, it explores the mediating roles of peer support and core self-evaluations in these associations. Data were analyzed using SmartPLS with the PROCESS module. The results indicate that bullying victimization is positively associated with suicidal behavior, and negatively associated with help-seeking attitudes and resilient coping. Core self-evaluations significantly mediate the associations between bullying victimization and both help-seeking attitudes and resilient coping, highlighting the importance of self-perceptions in mitigating adverse effects. Peer support, while positively related to help-seeking attitudes and resilient coping, did not significantly mediate the association between bullying victimization and suicidal behavior. These findings suggest that individual psychological resources play a crucial role in shaping adolescents' responses to bullying, while social support alone may not be sufficient to buffer the risk of suicidality. The study underscores the need for multi-level and culturally sensitive interventions, integrating school-based mental health programs, counseling services, and family support initiatives to strengthen resilience and promote help-seeking among adolescents.

Indexed as

bullying victimizationhelp-seeking attitudeslegal responsibilitymoral autonomypeer supportresilient copingsuicidal behavior

Identifiers

PMID41439227
PMCPMC12719503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.