ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Attention-Based Multimodal Deep Learning for Uveal Melanoma Classification Using Ultra-Widefield Fundus Images and Ocular Ultrasound.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning Optimisation Strategies for Uveal Melanoma Detection Using Ultra-Widefield Photography.Research square · 2026Article
- Attention-Based Multimodal Deep Learning for Uveal Melanoma Classification Using Ultra-Widefield Fundus Images and Ocular Ultrasound.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and evaluate a deep learning model that integrates ultra-widefield fundus photography and B-scan ultrasonography for automated classification of uveal melanoma (UM) and choroidal nevi. Design: A retrospective cross-sectional study. Subjects: This study included 174 patients (93 with UM and 81 with choroidal nevi) diagnosed at a tertiary eye center. For each patient, ultra-widefield fundus photographs and B-scan ultrasound images in both transverse and longitudinal orientations were acquired. Methods: A deep learning model was trained using ultra-widefield fundus photography, ultrasound images, and combinations of both. Fivefold cross-validation was used to evaluate model performance. Main Outcome Measures: The deep learning models were evaluated using accuracy, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Uveal melanomas had a mean thickness of 6.0 mm and a basal diameter of 12.6 mm, whereas nevi measured 1.8 mm and 6.5 mm, respectively. Among single-modality models, the model trained on transverse ultrasound images achieved the highest performance (accuracy: 92%; F1 score: 0.9227; AUC: 0.9538). Averaging predictions from the single-modality models provided only modest gains because their outputs sometimes conflicted. In contrast, the model that combined fundus photographs and ultrasound images using an attention mechanism achieved the highest overall performance (accuracy: 94%; F1 score: 0.9445; AUC: 0.9606), outperforming all other configurations by effectively integrating complementary information from both modalities. Conclusions: Multimodal deep learning that combines fundus photography and ultrasound imaging improves the classification of UM and choroidal nevi. This approach demonstrates feasibility for leveraging the strengths of each modality for automated classification of UM and choroidal nevi. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.