Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41439215›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Impact of Reticular Pseudodrusen on Clinical and Ocular Characteristics and Progression Rate of Geographic Atrophy in Japanese Patients.

Naoko Ueda-Arakawa, Yukiko Sato, Masahiro Miyake, Ayako Takahashi, Yuki Mori, Yasunori Miyara, Chikako Hara, Yoko Kitajima, Ruka Maruko, Moeko Kawai and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. High choroidal vascularity index zones favor the distribution of drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment in intermediate age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Naoko Ueda-ArakawaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yukiko SatoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiro MiyakeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Ayako TakahashiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuki MoriDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasunori MiyaraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan.
Chikako HaraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yoko KitajimaDepartment of Micro-Technology and Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Ruka MarukoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Moeko KawaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki OhnakaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Hideki KoizumiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan.
Maiko Maruyama-InoueDepartment of Micro-Technology and Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Yasuo YanagiDepartment of Micro-Technology and Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Tomohiro IidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mineo KondoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
Taiji SakamotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Akitaka TsujikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To elucidate the impact of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) on the clinical and ocular characteristics and progression rate of geographic atrophy (GA) in Japanese patients. Design: A multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. Participants: A total of 173 eyes from 173 Japanese patients (135 with conventional GA and 35 with pachychoroid GA) were included; 79 eyes with conventional GA were included in the follow-up group. Methods: Reticular pseudodrusen status, GA type (conventional/pachychoroid), GA location (central/noncentral), GA pattern (unifocal/multifocal), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and fellow-eye status were assessed using multimodal imaging. The GA progression rate was calculated in both mm Main Outcome Measures: Clinical and ocular characteristics and progression rate of GA according to RPD status. Results: Reticular pseudodrusen were observed in 42.4% (73 eyes) of the 173 study eyes, 54.1% of the eyes with conventional GA, and none of the eyes with pachychoroid GA. Among patients with conventional GA, those with RPD were significantly more female (56.2 vs. 30.6%, Conclusions: Reticular pseudodrusen are frequently observed in Japanese patients with conventional GA. Clinical and ocular characteristics differ according to the RPD status, similarly in White patients. Geographic atrophy in the presence of RPD progresses rapidly, at a rate comparable to that in White patients, and most patients with RPD exhibit bilateral late AMD. Given that RPD in eyes with GA constitutes a strong risk factor for both fast GA progression and bilateral late AMD, GA with RPD should be treated at an early stage prior to foveal involvement, even though GA in Asians has been reported to progress slowly. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Age-related macular degenerationAsianGeographic atrophyJapaneseReticular pseudodrusen

Identifiers

PMID41439215
PMCPMC12719149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.