ArticleCase reports in hematology2025
Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory t(11;14) Multiple Myeloma and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Venetoclax.
Article in Case reports in hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory t(11;14) Multiple Myeloma and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Venetoclax.Case reports in hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have an inherent risk for secondary myeloid malignancies. Innovative approaches to treatment are needed when these hematologic malignancies co-occur. Venetoclax (VEN), a BCL2 inhibitor, has been used in combination with Azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia, in the trial setting in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and in t(11; 14) MM in the salvage setting. Here, we present a case report of concurrent treatment of high-risk MDS and t(11; 14) MM in a patient, using VEN-based therapy. Following diagnosis with IgG t(11; 14) MM, the patient received treatment with Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone and achieved a very good partial response. She subsequently proceeded to autologous stem cell transplant and thereafter continued on Lenalidomide maintenance. Relapsed disease was noted 3 years following transplant, with a concurrent diagnosis of a high-risk MDS (mutations in NRAS and DNMT3A). Given the known efficacy of VEN in her concomitant malignancies, we elected to use a VEN-based regimen, at a lower dose of VEN than has been shown to be efficacious in t(11; 14) MM. Bone marrow biopsy demonstrated response from the perspective of both malignancies, until she had relapsed disease with a mixed phenotype acute leukemia ∼ 19 months after relapsed MM/diagnosis of high-risk MDS. Overall, this case demonstrates successful treatment of both hematologic malignancies at a lower dose of VEN than previously shown to be efficacious in t(11; 14) MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.