Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41439198›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2025

Expert transvaginal ultrasound is determinant for diagnosing pelvic conditions after recurrent implantation failure in IVF.

Aikaterini Selntigia, Consuelo Russo, Daniele Farsetti, Giulia Monaco, Elvira Nocita, Sara Valeriani, Federica Iacobini, Caterina Exacoustos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aikaterini SelntigiaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Consuelo RussoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Daniele FarsettiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Giulia MonacoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Elvira NocitaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Sara ValerianiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Federica IacobiniDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Caterina ExacoustosDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a clinical phenomenon characterized by a lack of implantation after several embryo-transfers. The aim of this study was to evaluate missing pelvic pathologies in patients with RIF, following at least two embryo-transfers of good-quality blastocyst, using a dedicated transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) performed by experienced specialists. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with RIF who were admitted to the Gynecological Ultrasound Unit of the University of Rome 'Tor Vergata' between 2020 and 2024 for a second-opinion ultrasound. Only patients with transfers of euploid blastocysts and/or blastocysts from oocytes donation were included. All patients underwent 2D, 3D and Power-Doppler transvaginal examination to evaluate all possible pelvic pathologies. Results: The study included 152 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Pathological pelvic findings were identified in 45 of 152 women during the initial TVS scans performed at the IVF centres before ET, whereas expert TVS evaluation at our center after RIF diagnosed pelvic pathology in 129 of 152 cases (p < 0.0001). Significant differences were observed for all pathological ultrasound findings between the initial IVF center scan and the expert TVS, except for isthmocele. In particular, the lowest overall agreement (OA), Cohen's Kappa (K) and positive percent agreement (PPA) was described regarding the diagnosis of adenomyosis, uterine malformations, hydrosalpinx and deep infiltrated endometriosis. Conclusion: Our study revealed a significant discrepancy in the diagnosis of ultrasound-detectable pelvic pathologies between IVF centres and our expert gynecological ultrasound unit. This difference highlights the potential underdiagnosis of critical pelvic conditions when ultrasound is performed by not expert sonographers in IVF centres.

Indexed as

Implantation failureInfertilityTransvaginal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41439198
PMCPMC12719194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.