ArticleISME communications2025
Exploring the human small intestinal luminal microbiome via a newly developed ingestible sampling device.
Article in ISME communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05477069 (Feasibility Study of an Innovative Medical Device for Sampling the Contents of the Small Intestine. Functional Evaluation on the Transit of Healthy Volunteers. A First in Man, Prospective, Monocentric, Not Randomized Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility Study of an Innovative Medical Device for Sampling the Contents of the Small Intestine. Functional Evaluation on the Transit of Healthy Volunteers. A First in Man, Prospective, Monocentric, Not Randomized Study.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From diet to function: using synthetic microbial communities to map gut microbial interactions.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Review
- The elephant (bird) in the room: unknown mechanisms and unresolved impacts of low DNA yields in avian microbiome research.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Small intestinal microbiome, the underrated maestro of SIMO disease.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Because accessing the small intestine is technically challenging, studies of the small intestinal microbiome are predominantly conducted in patients rather than in healthy individuals. Invasive clinical procedures, such as endoscopy or surgery, usually performed for therapeutic purposes, are typically required for sample collection. Although stomas offer a less invasive means for repeated sampling, their use remains restricted to patient populations. As a result, the small intestinal microbiome of healthy individuals remains largely understudied. This study evaluated a novel ingestible medical device for collecting luminal samples from the small intestine. A monocentric interventional trial (NCT05477069) was conducted on 15 healthy subjects. Metagenomics, metabolomics, and culturomics were used to assess the effectiveness of the medical device in characterizing the healthy small intestinal microbiome and identifying potential biomarkers. The small intestinal microbiota differed significantly from the fecal microbiota, displaying high inter-individual variability, lower species richness and reduced alpha diversity. A combined untargeted and semi-targeted LC-MS/MS metabolomics approach identified a distinct small intestinal metabolic footprint, with bile acids and amino acids being the most abundant metabolite classes. Host- and host/microbe-derived bile acids were particularly abundant in small intestinal samples. Using a fast culturomics approach on two small intestinal samples, we achieved species-level characterization and identified 90 bacterial species, including five potentially novel ones. This study demonstrates the efficacy of our novel sampling device in enabling comprehensive small intestinal microbiome analysis through an integrative, multi-omics approach. This approach allows distinct microbiome signatures to be identified between small intestinal and fecal samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.