ArticleEuropean urology open science2026
Long-term Survival of Midurethral Mesh Slings for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaginal Mesh Revision Surgery: A Focus on Functional Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Robotic midurethral sling removal: surgical technique and outcomes of a single center series.World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Midurethral sling (MUS) use for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has declined because of controversies. However, there is little evidence on the long-term prevalence of MUS reoperation. The aim of this study was to examine long-term removal and reoperation rates among women with MUS. Methods: This national retrospective cohort study included all female patients aged ≥18 yr with a first MUS insertion for SUI in all French public hospitals and private practices between January 1, 2013, and September 30, 2022. Patients were followed until January 1, 2023. The primary outcome was the MUS removal rate. Secondary outcomes were new MUS insertion and any other surgery for SUI. Cox regression models were used to assess potential factors associated with MUS removal. Key findings and limitations: The study included 217 326 women with a first MUS insertion. There were 5851 MUS removals and 9521 new MUS insertions. Most removals occurred within the first year (58%). The MUS removal rate was 2.7% at 10 yr. There were fewer removals after transoboturator insertion than after retropubic insertion. Alcohol consumption, smoking, and obesity were associated with MUS reoperation. At 10 yr, the rate of new MUS insertions was 4.5% and the rate of any other surgeries was 2.8%. Conclusions and clinical implications: These findings may help in counseling patients on decision-making for SUI treatment. Patient summary: One treatment option for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women is insertion of a mesh sling. We looked at the rates of sling removal and reoperation among women treated for SUI in the French population. We found that after 10 years, only 2.7% of cases needed sling removal, 4.5% needed a new sling inserted without removal of the previous sling, and 2.8% needed another type of surgery. These results will help patients in choosing the correct treatment for SUI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.