ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2025
Linear predictive coding electroencephalography algorithms predict mortality in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Mortality is increased in Parkinson's disease (PD) and is difficult to predict because of its heterogeneity and the availability of few reliable prognostic markers. Objectives: We used electroencephalography (EEG) recordings and the Linear Predictive Coding EEG Algorithm for PD (LEAPD) to classify 3-year mortality status and correlate LEAPD indices with time to death. Methods: 2-minutes resting-state EEG from 94 PD patients was used for binary classification of 3-year mortality status (22 deceased). Single-channel classification using a balanced dataset of 44 was performed using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). Robustness was evaluated by truncating the recordings. LOOCV Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) was obtained between LEAPD indices and time to death. Optimum hyperparameters obtained using a balanced training dataset of 30 were tested on the remaining 64 by 10,000 randomized comparisons of 7 vs 7, using 5 channel combinations. Separate hyperparameters for the best ρ, obtained using the same training dataset, were used for out-of-sample correlation for the remaining 7 deceased. Results: The deceased participants were older and had more severe disease and worse cognition at baseline. Several EEG channels yielded 100 % LOOCV accuracy. Five had robust performance under data truncation. The correlations ranged between ρ = -0.59 to -0.86 and were significant after adjusting for age, cognitive and motor impairment. Out-of-sample testing using the best-performing 5-channel combination yielded a mean accuracy of 83 %. Out-of-sample Spearman's ρ was -0.82. Conclusions: Short resting EEG using machine learning algorithms such as linear predictive coding can predict mortality in PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.