ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Severe Dry Cough Followed by Eosinophilia Without Pulmonary Infiltrates After Dupilumab Treatment in Patients with Severe Asthma: A Series of Five Cases.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Dupilumab is known to cause transient, asymptomatic eosinophilia, but in rare cases it can present as eosinophilic pneumonia accompanied by cough. This study reports a distinct manifestation of dupilumab-related eosinophilia presenting as a severe dry cough despite the absence of radiological or clinical evidence of eosinophilic pneumonia. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) treated with dupilumab at the Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease between August 2020 and February 2025 was conducted. Data on clinical manifestations, objective indicators and subjective questionnaires were collected at four time-points: before dupilumab initiation, preceding dupilumab-related cough, during the cough episode, and after cough resolution. Results: Five patients treated with dupilumab (three males and two females with a mean age of 65.6 ± 9.2 years) developed a severe dry cough and marked eosinophilia (1,130-4,050 cells/μL) without radiologic or clinical evidence of eosinophilic pneumonia. The cough began after one to eleven dupilumab courses. Despite the increase in eosinophils, all patients achieved their personal best FEV1 versus baseline. The symptoms resolved with a short course of systemic corticosteroids (in four patients) or antitussive therapy alone (in one patient). Conclusion: Dupilumab-related eosinophilia can manifest as a severe, steroid-responsive coughing despite the absence of parenchymal eosinophilic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.