ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Gangrenous Cholecystitis Prediction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable early prediction of short-term severe deterioration in gallstone-related biliary disease using MIMIC-IV, eICU, and local real-world data.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting gangrenous cholecystitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in gangrenous cholecystitis: advances in risk factor identification and preoperative prediction-a scoping review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Single cell transcriptomic analysis reveals pathogenic cell heterogeneity and candidate inflammatory-associated markers in STZ-induced diabetic mouse retina.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- "Age is associated with Achilles tendon thickness in older adults: an ultrasound case-control study with intra-observer reliability".Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning model for preoperative prediction of Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) using multicenter clinical data. Patients and Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 744 patients with cholecystitis who underwent cholecystectomy at one institution, split into training (n=521) and testing (n=223) cohorts, and a temporal external validation cohort of 300 patients from a second center. Twenty preoperative variables were screened by LASSO regression and Boruta algorithm; predictors selected by both were used to construct six machine learning models. Model performance was assessed via AUC, calibration, and decision curve analysis. SHAP analysis provided model interpretability. Results: The Random Forest (RF) model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an AUC of 0.893 in the training set, 0.875 in the testing set, and 0.818 in external validation. Calibration and decision curve analyses indicated excellent agreement and clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified gallbladder wall thickening, C-reactive protein, pericholecystic fluid, white blood cell count, and impacted stone as the most influential predictors, ensuring transparency of model decisions. Conclusion: In our multicenter cohorts, this interpretable machine learning model showed good discrimination for preoperative risk stratification of gangrenous cholecystitis and acceptable generalizability between centers. By integrating clinical, laboratory, and imaging features and providing explainability, the approach may assist perioperative decision-making when used alongside clinical judgment. Prospective, multicenter evaluations and clinical impact studies are warranted before routine clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.