ArticleCureus2025
Enhancing SOAP Documentation in Internal Medicine: A Three-Cycle Clinical Audit at Soba University Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of digital simulations for clinical assessment and documentation of temporomandibular disorders: a retrospective study.Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-quality clinical documentation, particularly using the SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) format, is essential for patient safety and effective healthcare delivery. In Sudan, inadequate documentation practices have been linked to poor continuity of care and increased risk of medical errors. This study aimed to evaluate and improve the quality of SOAP documentation in the Internal Medicine department at Soba University Hospital, Khartoum, through a structured clinical audit. Methods: A retrospective, three-cycle clinical audit was conducted using a locally adapted SOAP checklist covering 21 criteria across administrative, subjective, objective, assessment, and plan components. Data were collected from 111 patient records (37 per cycle) between March 2021 and March 2022. Following an initial audit identifying key deficiencies, targeted interventions-including educational seminars, consultant mentorship, standardized templates, and improved equipment provision-were implemented. Compliance rates were compared across audit cycles. Results: The initial audit revealed significant deficiencies, with only two criteria meeting the ≥80% compliance standard. Post intervention, notable improvements were observed in several areas: social history documentation increased by 48.4%, history of presenting illness by 25.7%, and medication planning reached the 80% standard. However, persistent gaps remained in administrative data, objective components, and allergy documentation. Differential diagnosis documentation showed variability across cycles. Conclusion: Targeted interventions led to measurable improvements in SOAP documentation quality, particularly in subjective and plan components. Nevertheless, administrative and objective documentation standards remain unmet, highlighting the need for sustained education, standardized processes, and systemic reforms. These findings provide a foundation for broader quality improvement initiatives in Sudanese healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.