Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41439059›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Surgical Burden of Animal Bites Referred to Orthopaedics: A 10-Year Cohort Study of 168 Patients From a UK Major Trauma Centre.

Nicholas Tse Hao Ng, Khemerin Eng, Joseph Northway, Alan R Norrish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas Tse Hao NgDepartment of Orthopaedics, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
Khemerin EngDepartment of Orthopaedics, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
Joseph NorthwayDepartment of Orthopaedics, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
Alan R NorrishDepartment of Orthopaedics, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Animal bites impose a substantial, yet under-recognised, burden on orthopaedic services. We characterised the epidemiology, injury patterns, management, and short-term outcomes of bite injuries requiring orthopaedic input at a UK Major Trauma Centre over 10 years. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients referred to orthopaedics with animal-bite injuries between December 2015 and March 2025. Eligible cases were identified from a prospectively maintained trauma database and verified against electronic records. Inclusion encompassed mammalian, reptile, avian, fish, amphibian, and spider bites; human, "fight," and insect stings/tick exposures were excluded. Demographics, injury site and structures involved, management (operative vs non-operative), microbiology, complications, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS) were extracted using a standardised proforma. Early presentation was defined as <24 hours post-injury. Descriptive statistics were used. Results We included 168 patients. A total of 158 (94.0%) were adults; 89 (53.0%) were females; and the mean age was 49 years. Early presentation occurred in 88 (52.4%); LOS 2.6 vs 2.9 days for delayed. Domestic animals accounted for 166 (98.8%) injuries, dogs (110, 65.5%) and cats (56, 33.3%). Upper limb involvement predominated, 160 (95.2%); hand injuries were most common, 128 (76.2%). Structural damage included 11 (6.5%) open fractures, 15 (8.9%) tendon, 14 (8.3%) muscle, seven (4.2%) nerve, and two (1.2%) vascular injuries. Dog bites accounted for all open fractures and all neurovascular injuries, and most tendon (11, 73.3%) and muscle (11, 78.6%) trauma; multi-limb injuries were dog-related in 16 (88.9%). Overall, 109 (64.9%) underwent surgery and 12 (7.1%) required reoperation. Microbiology was obtained in 82 (48.8%); 41 (50.0%) were culture-negative.

Indexed as

animal bite managementcat bitecomplicationdog bitesepidemiology and public healthmajor trauma centremicrobiological profilemusculoskeletal injurysurgical burdentrauma and orthopaedics

Identifiers

PMID41439059
PMCPMC12720382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.