ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Molecular mechanisms and translational advances in bladder cancer: from driver genes to precision therapy.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal SUV39H1 as a master epigenetic driver of immunosuppressive niche and stemness in bladder cancer.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside, an AMPK activator, enhances TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in human bladder cancer cells in a p38 MAPK-dependent manner.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based integration identifies lactylation biomarkers for prognosis prediction and tumor microenvironment modulation in bladder cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- The tumor microenvironment: a dynamic ecosystem and therapeutic nexus in modern oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Nanorobots and Exosomes: Driving the New Frontier for Bladder Tumors through Non-Coding RNAs.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Research progress in augmentation strategies for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in bladder cancer: from biological determinants to clinical applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer is a highly heterogeneous malignant tumor of the urinary system with high recurrence rates, posing significant challenges in its diagnosis and treatment. Advances in multi-omics research have elucidated the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis and progression of bladder cancer, including driver gene mutations (e.g., FGFR3, TP53/RB1), dysregulation of signaling pathways (such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS-MAPK), epigenetic alterations, non-coding RNA networks, tumor microenvironment remodeling, and metabolic reprogramming. This review systematically summarizes recent progress in translational research bridging molecular mechanisms to breakthroughs in precision therapy, covering the clinical applications and challenges of FGFR inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and gene therapies. Translational efforts are increasingly relying on molecular subtyping to develop subtype-specific treatment strategies. Although significant advances have been made in precision therapy for bladder cancer, critical research gaps remain, including tumor heterogeneity, therapy resistance, and insufficient validation of biomarkers. Future research directions emphasize the potential of liquid biopsy for non-invasive diagnosis and dynamic monitoring, rational combination therapies, multi-omics data integration, and artificial intelligence in advancing personalized treatment, providing a systematic and forward-looking perspective on precision medicine in bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.