ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
The 3V score and joint associations of low ultra-processed food, biodiverse and plant-based diets on colorectal cancer risk: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protective Effects of Plant-Based Diets Against Colorectal Carcinogenesis via Modulation of Key Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Diet may modify colorectal cancer risk. We investigated the associations of three dietary patterns, ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption, healthy plant-based food consumption, and food biodiversity, separately and combined into a "3V" score with risk of colorectal cancer. Methods: This study used data from the prospective European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, which recruited participants between 1992, and 2000, from 23 centres in ten European countries. The 3V score was developed by standardising and summing the healthy plant diet index (hPDI) and dietary species richness per year (DSR) and subtracting UPF (Nova category 4) intake in % g/day. Associations with colorectal cancer risk were assessed among 450,111 middle-aged participants of the EPIC cohort using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. Independent associations of each 3V component were assessed using mutually adjusted models. Data-driven thresholds were applied to assess adherence to the 3V components, set at the minimum value of the fourth quintile for hPDI, DSR and low UPF. Findings: During mean (standard deviation (SD)) follow-up of 14.9 (4) years, absolute colorectal cancer rates were 8.59 and 10.37 cases/10,000 person-years for the highest and lowest quintiles of the 3V score, respectively. Inverse associations were found for colorectal (hazard ratio (HR) comparing highest vs lowest quintile: 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.94), colon (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72-0.93), and distal colon cancer (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.99), with significant linear trends observed across quintiles. UPF intake was positively associated with colon cancer risk (HR per 1 SD increment: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.11) when mutually adjusted for the other 3V components. Adherence to low UPF, high hPDI, and high DSR was inversely associated with colorectal (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.61-0.88), colon (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.57-0.91), and rectal cancer (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46-0.91) compared to adhering to none. Interpretation: Adherence to the 3V diet is associated with lower risk of colorectal cancers. Funding: Cancer Research UK, World Cancer Research Fund.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.