Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438973›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Intramuscular versus intradermal administration of fractional dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine in Mozambique, 2020-2022: an, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial.

Edna Omar Viegas, Emilia Fumane, Kassia Pereira, Mahira Amade, Ilesh Jani, Onélia Guilche, Catildo Cubai, Sandra Valdez, Bernardo A Mainou, Rocio Lopez Cavestany and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04027036 (Clinical Trial to Compare the Immunogenicity of the Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04027036 phase2completednot on this map

Clinical Trial to Compare the Immunogenicity of the Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine (IPV) Administered in Reduced Doses Intramuscularly or Intradermally in Infants at 2 and 4 Months of Age in the Maputo City

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Saúde, MozambiqueRan2020 to 2022Enrolled382ConditionsPolioArmsInactivated poliovirus vaccine in reduced doses
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Edna Omar ViegasInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Emilia FumaneInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Kassia PereiraInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Mahira AmadeInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Ilesh JaniInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Onélia GuilcheInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Catildo CubaiInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sandra ValdezCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bernardo A MainouCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rocio Lopez CavestanyPolio Eradication, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Visalakshi JeyaseelanPolio Eradication, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ondrej MachPolio Eradication, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The development of fractional-dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine (fIPV, a fifth of a full IPV dose) has provided a dose-stretching, less costly, and immunogenic alternative to full dose IPV, enhancing global IPV introduction and accessibility. fIPV is administered intradermally, however, intradermal injection is considered difficult and requires skilled administration. This study aimed at assessing the non-inferiority of intramuscular versus intradermal administration of fIPV in young infants in Maputo, Mozambique. Methods: This was an open label, randomized, non-inferiority trial conducted between 2020 and 2022 (Ref. NCT04027036). Healthy IPV-naive infants attending routine immunization services were enrolled in the study and block randomized to receive two sequential doses of fIPV (0.1 mL), either intramuscularly or intradermally, at two and four months of age. Blood samples were collected at four timepoints: baseline, two months after the first dose, one week after the second dose, and one month after the second dose. Samples were analyzed via microneutralization assays against all three poliovirus serotypes. The primary endpoint was defined as cumulative seroconversion rates to type 2 poliovirus after administration of two doses of intramuscular versus intradermal fIPV. The study has been completed, and data analyzed per protocol. Findings: 382 infants (49.5% [189/382] female) were enrolled in the study between 12 August 2020 and 31 May 2022. Cumulative type 2 seroconversion after two fIPV doses reached 92.1% (139/151, 95% CI 86.5-95.8) in the intradermal group and 96.1% (148/154, 95% CI 91.7-98.6) in the intramuscular group (=0.15). The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infections, not related to the study vaccine. 12 serious adverse events occurred in the study, none were considered to be related to the study vaccines. Interpretation: This is the second study demonstrating non-inferiority of fIPV administered intramuscularly compared with intradermally; and the first study assessing immunogenicity in young infants. The results informed vaccine policymaking, leading to a recent recommendation from the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization from WHO on intramuscular administration of fIPV in outbreak response. Funding: World Health Organization.

Indexed as

Fractional dose inactivated poliovirus vaccineIntramuscular administrationMozambiquePoliovirusSeroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID41438973
PMCPMC12719737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.