Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438961›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

A Decision Support Tool Using an Open-Source Methodology for Identifying Woody Encroachment and Juniper Species Vulnerability in the Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma, USA.

Mark Micozzi, Justin Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark MicozziOffice of Natural Resources The Chickasaw Nation Ada Oklahoma USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5661-2945
Justin BakerHazen and Sawyer Austin Texas USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a result of 20th century farming practices, fire suppression, grazing pressures, federal agriculture policies, drought, and related factors, juniper trees have experienced a dramatic increase in abundance across the Great Plains region, including millions of acres in Oklahoma. This invasive vegetation poses a significant threat to the environment, soil health, cultural resources and economies within the Cross Timbers region of the Chickasaw Nation in south-central Oklahoma. To combat these negative impacts, the Chickasaw Nation (CN) has undertaken a proactive approach to evaluate the extent of juniper encroachment within the CN treaty territory (CNTT) and to use this information to make an economic case to landowners for the implementation of both prescribed burns, and juniper removal in general. This article describes the creation of a species-focused evaluation methodology, model, and decision-support tool, called the Juniper Evaluation Tool (JET), that is simple, open-source, and applicable at an appropriate spatial scale to assist landowners, land managers, and CN resource managers in targeting best management practices and slowing the encroachment of juniper tree species. The JET, a product of a Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG), builds on the methods and functions of other planning tools, such as the Rangeland Analysis Platform (RAP) and the Rangeland Brush Estimation Toolbox (RaBET), but the outputs are tailored to parcel-level management for watershed conservation planning in the CNTT. The JET aims to be a resource that is replicable, scalable, and actionable, and may provide the basis for an expanded tool that can be applied in other parts of Oklahoma and the Great Plains.

Indexed as

Chickasaw NationconservationEastern RedcedarGoogle earth enginejuniperjuniper evaluation toolOklahomaremote sensingvulnerabilitywoody encroachment

Identifiers

PMID41438961
PMCPMC12719920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.