ArticleInterventional pain medicine2025
2-Year clinical outcomes following combined iliotibial band and gluteus medius percutaneous ultrasound tenotomy in refractory GTPS.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS) is a common cause of chronic lateral hip pain, often refractory to conservative medical management (CMM). Combined percutaneous ultrasound-guided tenotomy (PUT) of the gluteus medius (GMed) and iliotibial band (ITB) has shown promising one-year results, but data on long-term outcomes remain limited. This study evaluates two-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing combined GMed and ITB PUT for recalcitrant GTPS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 69 patients (79 hips) treated with combined GMed and ITB PUT between January 2022 and August 2023. Baseline and follow-up data, collected for an average of 2-year, were obtained through chart review and structured phone interviews. The primary outcome was ≥50 % reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores. Secondary outcomes included side-lying tolerance, sitting-to-standing ability, responder rate and need for additional hip interventions. Responder status required both pain reduction and complete side-lying tolerance. Statistical significance was evaluated using paired t-tests with p < 0.05. Results: Median baseline Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was 10 interquartile range (IQR 9-10), decreasing significantly to 2 (IQR 1-4) at 1, 6, and 12 months, then increasing to 6 (IQR 4-10) at 24 months (p < 0.001 vs. baseline). Rates of ≥50 % improvement in NRS were 88.6 % at 1 month, 89.6 % at 6 months, 83.0 % at 12 months, and 59.5 % at 24 months. Side-lying tolerance improved from 21.5 % hips at baseline to 88.9 % reporting improvement at 1 month and 55.7 % at 24 months (p < 0.001). Sitting-to-standing ability showed sustained improvement at 81.0 % at 24 months. Composite responder rate declined from 88.6 % at 1 month to 57.0 % at 24 months. Subsequent invasive interventions were required in a minority of cases (2.5 % total hip arthroplasty; 11.4 % repeat TENEX). Conclusion: Combined PUT of the GMed and ITB provides durable pain relief and functional improvement in patients with refractory GTPS at two years post-procedure. Despite declining responder rates over time, this minimally invasive dual-target technique demonstrates a favorable safety profile and may delay or reduce the need for more invasive surgery. Further prospective studies are warranted to optimize patient selection and validate long-term efficacy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.