Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438880›Full record

ReviewJPRAS open2026

Surgical nerve wrapping for brachial plexus neuropathy: A systematic review.

François Thuau, Guillaume Gadbled, Théodore Lahmar, Pierre Perrot, Ugo Lancien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

François ThuauCHU Nantes, Plastic Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Department, Nantes University, 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes, France.
Guillaume GadbledCHU Nantes, Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery Department, Nantes University, 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes, France.
Théodore LahmarCHU Nantes, Plastic Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Department, Nantes University, 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes, France.
Pierre PerrotCHU Nantes, Plastic Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Department, Nantes University, 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes, France.
Ugo LancienCHU Nantes, Plastic Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Department, Nantes University, 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nerve wrapping provides protection, reduces adhesions, and supports regeneration, with proven benefits in median and ulnar neuropathies. Brachial plexus neuropathies-arising from neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS), radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP), or trauma-pose distinct challenges, and indications for wrapping remain poorly defined. We conducted a systematic review of brachial plexus wrapping techniques to clarify approaches and outcomes. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest were searched following PRISMA guidelines; the protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Risk of bias was assessed with the MINORS tool. Extracted data included patient characteristics, surgical techniques, functional outcomes, complications, and recurrences. Results: Seventeen studies involving 645 patients (mean age 43.8 years; M/F 1/3.92) were included. The main indications were NTOS (77.1 %) and RIBP (22.6 %). Eleven wrapping techniques were identified: eight different flaps ( Conclusion: Brachial plexus wrapping may improve pain and function in selected patients, but current evidence is heterogeneous, retrospective, and at high risk of bias. Standardized, prospective controlled studies are required to determine its role relative to isolated neurolysis.Level of evidence: III.

Indexed as

Brachial plexusNeurogenic thoracic outlet syndromePlexopathySystematic reviewWrapping

Identifiers

PMID41438880
PMCPMC12719742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.