ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2026
Evaluation of pregnancy outcomes using a novel hysterosalpingography scoring system for tubal patency.
Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate pregnancy rates using a novel classification system based on hysterosalpingography (HSG) findings, categorizing tubal patency as either patent or functionally deficient. Furthermore, the study assesses the predictive value of this scoring system for fertility outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 4461 patients who underwent HSG at an academic radiology center between January 2020 and December 2022. HSG findings and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were systematically analyzed. Results: Of the 2461 patients initially followed up, 301 were excluded due to incomplete data, resulting in a final cohort of 2160 patients. Within two years post-HSG, 970 patients (44.9 %) achieved natural pregnancy, 808 (83.2 %) of whom resulted in live births. In vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies accounted for 35.8 % (n = 775). Ectopic pregnancies occurred in 1.8 % of patients, with a higher incidence in those with unilateral tubal occlusion. Using the novel scoring system-where Score 0 indicates bilateral patency, Score 1 indicates unilateral functional deficiency, and Score 2 indicates bilateral functional deficiency-the Score 0 group exhibited the highest natural pregnancy rate (51.1 %), which was significantly higher than that of the Score 1 and Score 2 groups. Natural pregnancy rates were 20.8 % for unilateral hydrosalpinx and 36.7 % for unilateral occlusion. Only 5 % of patients with bilateral hydrosalpinx conceived naturally. Age was a significant factor; women under 35 years had a natural pregnancy rate of 46.8 %, compared to 10.2 % in those over 40 years. Conclusion: Tubal patency status is significantly associated with pregnancy outcomes, and functional deficiencies appear to reduce fertility. The proposed HSG-based scoring system serves as a valuable predictive tool for pregnancy potential. Additionally, the presence of hydrosalpinx is associated with adverse pregnancy rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.