ArticleERJ open research2025
New-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure requiring noninvasive ventilation.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and COPD are the most common cardiac arrhythmia and chronic lung conditions worldwide. Exacerbations of COPD can be associated with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF). It is unclear if new-onset AF (NOAF) during hospitalisation with AHRF influences long-term outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a global federated health research network. Patients ≥18 years old and hospitalised with a known diagnosis of COPD and new AHRF requiring noninvasive ventilation (NIV) were divided into two cohorts based on the development of NOAF within 7 days of AHRF. After propensity score matching (1:1), there was a total of 14 213 patients in each group. Outcomes were recorded at 1 year from the index admission to hospital. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death, re-admission, stroke, myocardial infarction, composite embolic end-point (acquired absence of limb, acute vascular disorders of intestine, acute and critical limb ischaemia) and dementia. Results: At 12 months following hospitalisation with AHRF requiring NIV, patients who developed NOAF during their admission had a statistically higher rate of death (hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% CI 1.21-1.32), re-admission (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.10), stroke (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.27-1.68), myocardial infarction (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.31-1.51) and the composite embolic end-point (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.22-1.51). There was no statistically significant difference in rates of dementia (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97-1.21). Conclusion: The development of NOAF in AHRF requiring NIV is associated with a higher risk of mortality, readmission, stroke, myocardial infarction and composite embolism at 1 year. NOAF functions an independent indicator of poor outcomes in such patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.