Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438846›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025

Psychological Outcomes After Mastectomy With vs Without Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study of 5160 Patients.

Yousef Tanas, Philong Nguyen, Joshua Wang, Stephen Chen, Sarya Swed, Aldona Spiegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast reconstruction after mastectomy restores both physical and emotional well-being. Nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction represents the final stage of restoration, yet its psychological impact remains unclear. Objectives: This study evaluates mental health outcomes following NAC vs non-NAC breast reconstruction. Methods: The TriNetX Research Network was queried for female breast cancer patients ≥ 18 years who underwent mastectomy with subsequent breast reconstruction from 2003 to 2023. Cohorts were stratified by NAC reconstruction. Propensity score matching was performed for demographics, comorbidities, substance use, cancer treatment, and pre-existing psychiatric conditions. Outcomes included various psychological conditions such as anxiety, depression, and antidepressant use at 3-, 12-, and 24-months postoperatively. Risk ratios (RRs), 95% CIs, and Results: Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction was associated with significantly lower risks of several psychiatric outcomes. Anxiety was reduced at 3 months (RR = 0.40; Conclusions: Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction is linked to lower long-term risks of various psychological conditions following mastectomy, suggesting psychosocial benefits beyond aesthetic restoration. These findings support holistic consideration of both surgical and mental health factors in reconstructive counseling. Level of Evidence 3 Risk:

Identifiers

PMID41438846
PMCPMC12720009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.