Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438838›Full record

ReviewGMS hygiene and infection control2025

Beyond quaternary ammonium compounds: Evaluating the harms of non-QAC disinfectant agents in healthcare and industry.

Mitchell K Ng, Michael A Mont

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mitchell K NgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Michael A MontDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) account for approximately 35% of the U.S. disinfectant market, but mounting concerns about their links to occupational asthma, reproductive toxicity, and antimicrobial resistance as well as their allergic potential have driven increased adoption of non-QAC chemical disinfectants, which comprise the remaining 65% of the market. This review critically examines the health, environmental, and material compatibility profiles of these non-QAC agents, including alcohols, chlorine compounds, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, and phenolics. While many of these agents reduce certain risks associated with QACs, they present new challenges such as respiratory irritation, corrosiveness, systemic toxicity, and ecological persistence. Hydrogen peroxide and peracetic acid show favorable biodegradability but may impair wastewater systems or damage sensitive equipment. Among emerging technologies, ultraviolet-C (UV-C) disinfection stands out for its high antimicrobial efficacy, absence of chemical residues, and strong environmental profile. A risk-balanced, evidence-based approach to disinfectant selection is essential, and greater integration of UV-C and other non-chemical technologies may support safer and more sustainable infection control practices.

Indexed as

disinfectantshealthcare risksnon-quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs)Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) disinfection

Identifiers

PMID41438838
PMCPMC12720267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.