Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438833›Full record

ReviewGMS hygiene and infection control2025

Mitigating aerosol contamination: strategies for contamination-free scaling.

Arathi Shenoy, Nina Shenoy, Chandra Kolluru Subhash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arathi ShenoyNitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Department of Periodontology, Mangalore, India.
Nina ShenoyNitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Department of Periodontology, Mangalore, India.
Chandra Kolluru SubhashNitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Department of Periodontology, Mangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasonic scaling has transformed periodontal therapy, delivering effective plaque and calculus removal. However, it also introduces risks through the generation of aerosols and splatter, which can transmit infectious agents. This review evaluates strategies to mitigate aerosol contamination in modern dental practice. Results: Pre-, intra-, and post procedural measures can significantly minimize contamination. Adequate ventilation, appropriate coolant selection, and preprocedural mouthrinses limit aerosol generation. Personal protective equipment reduces exposure, while high-volume evacuators (HVEs) effectively capture aerosols. After the procedure, thorough instrument reprocessing and surface disinfection, along with the use of high-efficiency particulate air filters (HEPA) and UV irradiation, are essential for air decontamination. Conclusion: Ongoing research continues to enhance control protocols. Implementing these measures effectively safeguards both patients and dental personnel, particularly in light of respiratory infections such as flu.

Indexed as

aerosol contaminationair decontaminationevacuationinfection controlultrasonic scaling

Identifiers

PMID41438833
PMCPMC12720265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.