Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438811›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2025

Surgical learning curve and flap survival in head and neck microvascular reconstruction using arterial and venous couplers.

Adam Gałązka, Karolina Bieńkowska-Pluta, Monika Paszkowska, Magdalena Misiak-Gałązka, Katarzyna Stawarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam GałązkaHead and Neck Cancer Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warszawa, Poland.
Karolina Bieńkowska-PlutaHead and Neck Cancer Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warszawa, Poland.
Monika PaszkowskaHead and Neck Cancer Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warszawa, Poland.
Magdalena Misiak-GałązkaMaria Skłodowska-Curie Medical Academy, Evimed Medical Center Ltd., Warszawa, Poland.
Katarzyna StawarzHead and Neck Cancer Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warszawa, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the surgical learning curve associated with the simultaneous use of arterial and venous couplers, alongside flap survival outcomes, in head and neck cancer reconstruction. Material and methods: A total of 127 pa-- tients (51 women, 76 men; aged 30-84 years) underwent microvascular free tissue transfer using the Synovis coupler device. Three flap types were used: radial forearm free flap, anterolateral thigh flap, and free fibula flap. Flap viability was assessed clinically during the first 7 postoperative days and at monthly follow-ups for up to one year. Operative time was recorded to monitor procedural efficiency. Results: Four flap failures were observed. The cumulative sum analysis of surgical time revealed three distinct learning phases: Initial Learning (cases 1-30), Performance Improvement (31-58), and Plateau (59 onward). Piecewise linear regression confirmed minimal trend predictability in the first two phases (R Conclusions: While hand-sewn anastomosis remains the standard in microsurgical reconstruction, this study supports arterial couplers as a safe, efficient alternative with a manageable learning curve -encouraging broader adoption in clinical practice.

Indexed as

coupler anastomosishead and neck cancermicrosurgerysurgical learning curve

Identifiers

PMID41438811
PMCPMC12721231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.