ReviewJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Critical review of minimally invasive periodontal surgery literature, a bibliometric study.
Review in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive periodontal surgery (MIPS) is an emerging surgical approach that has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in the management of interproximal intraosseous periodontal defects. Despite its potential, only a limited number of research groups have contributed to the development and refinement of MIPS techniques, which may hinder their broader clinical adoption. Objective: To examine publication trends and characterize the current state of research on MIPS through bibliometric indicators. Materials and Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted on Scopus-indexed documents published between 1996 and July 2023. Eligible records included original articles, reviews, and clinical trials that referenced MIPS techniques in their titles or abstracts. No categories of citable literature were excluded. Data extraction and analysis were performed using SciVal Results: A total of 145 documents were identified. The most prolific contributors were P. Cortellini, S. Harrel, and L. Trombelli. Nearly 90% of publications on MIPS appeared in Q1 or Q2 journals. The simplified papilla preservation flap and the minimally invasive surgical technique were the most frequently reported approaches. Overall, annual publication growth in the field of MIPS reached 8.33%. Research output was primarily concentrated in Europe, particularly Italy, with limited contributions from other regions. Self-citation rates were high (23.3%). Conclusion: Research on MIPS is expanding rapidly. Future efforts should prioritize multicenter collaborations, standardized methodology, and the development of international clinical guidelines to strengthen the evidence base and facilitate broader clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.