ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Comparative clinical evaluation of triangular flap design and trapezoidal flap design with advanced platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of human gingival recession: A randomized clinical trial.
Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Platelet concentrates play an important role in gingival recession (GR) treatments. Hence, the existing study aimed to evaluate two different coronally advanced flap designs with advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in the treatment of human GR. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial treated a total of 40 recession sites (20 per group). Trapezoidal and triangular flap designs were performed with A-PRF as biomaterial for GR. The clinical parameters such as probing depth, clinical attachment level, recession depth, recession width, width of keratinized tissue (WKT), and gingival thickness (GT), were recorded at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Results: During intragroup comparison postoperatively, all the parameters showed a statistically significant difference. While intergroup comparison showed no significant difference, GT and WKT were increased at 3 and 6 months. At 3 months, percentage of mean root coverage (MRC%) obtained in Group 1 was 95.83% and in Group 2 was 97.3%. While at 6 months, MRC% for Groups 1 and 2 was 88.03% and 82.16%, respectively. Conclusion: Both the flap techniques helped in improvement of clinical parameters for RC. A-PRF that was utilized in both groups helped in rapid healing without any adverse events. Even though the trapezoidal flap design showed keloid formation (KF), it was superior to the triangular flap design in terms of root coverage, as evidenced by higher GT and WKT and improved MRC%. The triangular flap design had the benefit of prevention of KF and improved the esthetic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.