ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Evaluation of an oral hygiene robot as a motivational aid in plaque control: A comparative study.
Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a game-based oral health intervention on plaque and gingival scores among schoolchildren: A nonrandomized controlled trial.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study evaluated the effectiveness of an innovative "oral hygiene robot" (OHR) compared to traditional audiovisual aids in motivating dental students to enhance their brushing skills. Materials and Methods: The study included thirty-two dental students, divided into two phases, which were further randomized into two groups: Group A and Group B. During the initial phase, no motivational methods were applied to both the groups. In the second phase, Group A received audiovisual education, while Group B utilized the OHR. Clinical parameters (gingival index and plaque index) for both the groups were recorded before oral prophylaxis (at day 0) and subsequently at the completion of the 1 Results: The findings revealed that both the methods of motivation significantly improved plaque control compared to the absence of motivational tools. However, students who interacted with the OHR demonstrated superior results in maintaining oral hygiene as the mean gingival index reduced from 1.661 ± 0.404 to 0.836 ± 0.349 ( Conclusion: The study highlights the potential of the OHR as an advanced educational tool for promoting better oral health practices. Its interactive and time-efficient design offers a more dynamic learning experience, making it a valuable addition to dental health education. This approach could pave the way for innovative strategies in oral hygiene training, ultimately enhancing patient care standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.