Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438642›Full record

ArticleData in brief2026

High-resolution dataset (2017-2023) of physical-geographical predictors for machine learning modelling of fluvial flooding: the Gidra river case, Slovakia.

Matej Vojtek, Ľubomír Benko, Jozef Kapusta, Dávid Držík, Michal Munk, Daša Munková, Martin Drlík, Jana Vojteková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matej VojtekDepartment of Geography, Geoinformatics and Regional Development, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Trieda A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.
Ľubomír BenkoDepartment of Informatics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Trieda A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.
Jozef KapustaDepartment of Informatics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Trieda A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.
Dávid DržíkDepartment of Informatics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Trieda A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.
Michal MunkDepartment of Informatics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Trieda A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.
Daša MunkováDepartment of Informatics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Trieda A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.
Martin DrlíkDepartment of Informatics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Trieda A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.
Jana VojtekováDepartment of Geography, Geoinformatics and Regional Development, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Trieda A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This data article releases geospatial predictor files for a section of the Gidra River (western Slovakia). Based on the last cycle of the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment from 2024 in Slovakia, the past fluvial floods and, especially, the flash flood from 7 June 2011 affected the studied river section and the Píla municipality significantly. These facts resulted in including the studied Gidra River section to critical river sections for the occurrence of fluvial floods. The collection comprises seven single-band rasters on a common 1 m grid: slope, Topographic Wetness Index, Stream Power Index, Height Above the Nearest Drainage, Euclidean distance from river, surface roughness, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. Source inputs are the LiDAR digital elevation model (DMR 5.0, resolution: 1 m) from 2017 and aerial orthophotos (resolution: 0.15 m) from 2023. All layers are georeferenced to a single CRS, co-registered to identical extent and transform, and provided as GeoTIFFs with documented units, no data, and datatypes. Processing relied on ArcGIS 10.2.2 software and Python for alignment and quality checks. Additional tables supply per-file inventory and descriptive statistics (min/mean/max/std) to enable automated validation and integration into geographic information system (GIS) and modelling workflows. The dataset is designed for reuse in flood-related and terrain-vegetation analyses, including feature engineering, benchmarking, and training of machine-learning (ML) models that require uniform, high-resolution predictors.

Indexed as

Euclidean distance from riverHeight above the nearest drainageManning’s roughnessNormalized difference vegetation indexSlopeStream power indexTopographic wetness index

Identifiers

PMID41438642
PMCPMC12720170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.