ArticleGenetics research2025
Clinical and Genetic Profiles of 11 Chinese Patients With Angelman Syndrome.
Article in Genetics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Clinical and Genetic Profiles of 11 Chinese Patients With Angelman Syndrome.Genetics research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angelman syndrome (AS) is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder resulting from different molecular mechanisms. Investigating the correlation between genotypes and phenotypes is crucial to facilitate accurate diagnosis and effective prevention strategies for this disorder. However, determining the genotypes of patients to analyze genotype‒phenotype correlations is challenging when parental genetic information is lacking. Therefore, we proposed a genotyping strategy for use with 11 unrelated Chinese patients with AS who were recruited for this study. The strategy involved a combination of methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR), exome sequencing (ES), Sanger sequencing, and MS multiplexed ligation probe amplification (MS-MLPA). The results revealed that the number of molecular deletions involving the critical 15q11. 2-q13 region (54.5%) was lower than that reported in other studies of Chinese patients. In addition, the prevalence of patients with imprinting defects (IDs) (27.3%) and variants (18.2%) was greater, whereas the proportion of patients with uniparental disomy (UPDs) was lower. We also summarized the characteristics of patients with different genotypes and analyzed the correlations between genotypes and phenotypes. Compared with the consensus for diagnostic criteria, our results showed that several features were less common, including the combination of frequent laughing/smiling, tremulous limb movements, ataxia of gait, and microcephaly. Conversely, the incidence of both epilepsy and abnormal electroencephalograms (EEGs) was greater. Notably, a novel mutation in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.