ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
BloodImage: Benchmarking vision transformers for blast detection in digital blood films using public and clinical datasets.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Leukemia is one of the most common cancers in the UK and it is usually initially diagnosed through the time-consuming and subjective analysis of blood films by an expert hematologist. When a small number of blast cells may be present on a blood film, it is difficult to detect them even after a thorough review. Automating blood film image analysis could significantly speed up the process and improve diagnostic accuracy. This study benchmarks a machine learning framework based on vision transformers (ViTs) for automated blast detection in digitized blood films, evaluating their generalizability across public and clinical datasets. Methods: We investigated different training strategies (hold-out/k-fold cross-validation), optimization (Adam or stochastic gradient descent (SGD)), and data preprocessing techniques (data augmentation, Gaussian pyramid downsampling) to assess their impact on the ViT performance when tested using both public (ALL-IDB) and clinical datasets from Barts Health NHS Trust. Results: Models trained with Adam performed better than those trained with SGD. The best-performing model, ViT2-Adam, achieved the highest accuracy (≥0.86) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curvearea under the curve (AUROC ≥ 0.95), which exceeded other stochastic models demonstrating its potential for integration into clinical diagnostic workflows. Conclusions: Our findings support the viability of ViTs for clinical integration in blood film analysis. Augmentation, advanced data splitting, and Gaussian downsampling enhance model generalization, offering a promising strategy for resource-limited or high-throughput diagnostic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.