Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438520›Full record

ArticleAccess microbiology2025

Gut microbiota composition in preterm infants with and without necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Fatemah Sadeghpour Heravi, Gerald L Murray, Jennifer A Danielewski, Suzanne M Garland, Erica L Plummer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Access microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fatemah Sadeghpour HeraviDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Gerald L MurrayDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Jennifer A DanielewskiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Suzanne M GarlandDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Erica L PlummerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-2671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a devastating gastrointestinal disorder in preterm infants with a high mortality rate. The aetiology of NEC appears to be multifaceted; however, gut microbiota dysbiosis likely plays a significant role. This systematic review aimed to describe how the gut microbiota of preterm infants with NEC differs from infants without NEC (PROSPERO: CRD42022344126). Databases were searched from inception to 22 June 2022 to identify eligible studies that examined the gut microbiota composition of preterm infants with and without NEC using sequencing methods. Results were described narratively. We identified 28 eligible studies. Overall, findings were heterogeneous and no single gut microbiota signature was associated with NEC in all studies. Importantly, 3 studies reported no difference in the gut microbiota composition between NEC and healthy infants, while studies reported a difference using one or more analytical method (i.e. alpha diversity, beta diversity or differential abundance analysis). Of note, NEC (or development of NEC) was positively associated with increased detection and/or abundance of

Indexed as

ClostridiumEnterobacteriaceaegut microbiotanecrotizing enterocolitispretermProteobacteria

Identifiers

PMID41438520
PMCPMC12720982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.