Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438486›Full record

ReviewPublic health challenges2025

Charters in Patient-Engaged Research: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence.

Jenny Martínez, Catherine Verrier Piersol, Richard W Hass, Felicia Chew, Amy Cunningham, Sharon Larson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health challenges, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jenny MartínezCollege of Population Health Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4244-1122
Catherine Verrier PiersolDepartment of Occupational Therapy Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Richard W HassCollege of Population Health Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Felicia ChewDepartment of Occupational Therapy Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Amy CunninghamDepartment of Family and Community Medicine Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Sharon LarsonCollege of Population Health Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Research study charters facilitate shared governance and power sharing with research partners when developed collaboratively and early on in a study. Study charters are negotiated and developed on a study-by-study basis, offering insight into study-specific dynamics between research partners and investigators, as well as the factors that each identify as important for their collaboration. This review aimed to map and synthesize existing evidence on the development, structure, and implementation of research study charters used in patient-engaged research. Methods: We searched peer-reviewed literature published worldwide in English between January 2019 and January 2025. Results: Our final sample consisted of 17 citations, including 5 journal articles and 12 charters available on Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's (PCORI's) Engagement Tool and Resource Repository. Research study charters varied in their development, structure, and content. Conclusions: We identified research study charters that varied in quality, detail, and methods. Valid, systematic, and inclusive study charters that are developed with research partners and reflect a diversity of perspectives can improve governance and engagement in research partnerships. Their adoption may enhance the quality and inclusivity of patient-centered research and represent an important area for future investigation.

Indexed as

comparative effectiveness researchmethodologypatient engagementsystematic reviewtranslational research

Identifiers

PMID41438486
PMCPMC12721919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.