ReviewPublic health challenges2025
Charters in Patient-Engaged Research: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Public health challenges, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Charters in Patient-Engaged Research: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence.Public health challenges · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Research study charters facilitate shared governance and power sharing with research partners when developed collaboratively and early on in a study. Study charters are negotiated and developed on a study-by-study basis, offering insight into study-specific dynamics between research partners and investigators, as well as the factors that each identify as important for their collaboration. This review aimed to map and synthesize existing evidence on the development, structure, and implementation of research study charters used in patient-engaged research. Methods: We searched peer-reviewed literature published worldwide in English between January 2019 and January 2025. Results: Our final sample consisted of 17 citations, including 5 journal articles and 12 charters available on Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's (PCORI's) Engagement Tool and Resource Repository. Research study charters varied in their development, structure, and content. Conclusions: We identified research study charters that varied in quality, detail, and methods. Valid, systematic, and inclusive study charters that are developed with research partners and reflect a diversity of perspectives can improve governance and engagement in research partnerships. Their adoption may enhance the quality and inclusivity of patient-centered research and represent an important area for future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.