ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
Critical analysis of instruments for assessment of presenteeism: an integrative review.
Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Presenteeism has been extensively investigated over the past decades. In the context of new forms of work organization and high competitiveness, the intensification of job demands can lead to insecurity and fear, compromising workers' well-being, health, and performance, with repercussions for presenteeism, illness, and absenteeism. Considering the conceptual evolution of the topic and its multidimensional causes, this integrative review aimed to describe, analyze, and discuss the instruments available in the literature for measuring presenteeism, focusing on the last 20 years of research. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Based on the findings, the results indicate that the choice of instrument should be made cautiously by occupational health professionals and managers. Future studies should prioritize the development and validation of culturally adapted measures that account for the specificities of different populations and work contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.