Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438479›Full record

ArticleThe Social service review2023

Youth Justice at a Crossroads: Twenty-First Century Progressive Reforms and Lessons to Inform the Path Forward.

Julia Lesnick, Laura S Abrams, Elizabeth S Barnert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Social service review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Minimum Age for California's Juvenile Legal System: Lessons on Collaborative Research to Drive Legislative Change.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia LesnickUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Laura S AbramsUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Elizabeth S BarnertUniversity of California, Los Angeles.

Funding

A Pilot Trial of a Network Intervention for Youth after IncarcerationK23DA045747 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BARNERT, ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$1.0M
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA045747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States juvenile legal system changed substantially during the twenty-first century. Notable shifts occurred with progressive reform trends aimed to promote developmentally-aligned, trauma-informed, and equitable youth justice systems. Now, in an increasingly complex and polarized landscape, the future of progressive change for youth justice faces a crossroads, with some calling for transformation and others advocating a path of continued gradual reform. In this critical literature review, we analyze the role of leading paradigms driving patterns of progressive reform in the US juvenile legal system during the twenty-first century. From this review, we reflect on strengths and limitations of predominant paradigms that have guided progressive change in youth justice, and offer key lessons to inform the path forward.

Indexed as

Juvenile Legal ReformSystems ChangeYouth Justice

Identifiers

PMID41438479
PMCPMC12721960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.