ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Modified external fixation technique for treatment of distal radial metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures in pediatric patients.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why it's better to believe in a larger definition of the diametaphyseal junction zone in pediatric distal radius fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Biomechanical stability of five fixation techniques for pediatric distal radius metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures: a finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Distal radius metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (DRMDJ) fractures in children are often unstable and frequently require surgical intervention. Although various clinical approaches are available, each has its limitations. We introduced a modified external fixation technique for managing pediatric DRMDJ fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this technique. Methods: Between June 2021 to June 2024, a total of 57 pediatric patients with DRMDJ fractures were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were managed using a modified external fixation technique that incorporated distraction closed reduction and fixation, thereby facilitating early functional recovery without the need for cast immobilization. Postoperative follow-up was conducted at scheduled intervals and included radiographic evaluation (x-rays), assessment of wrist function scores, and recording of patient satisfaction metrics. Results: Successful closed reduction and application of external fixation were achieved in all 57 pediatric patients. Throughout the follow-up period, no cases of nonunion or fixation failure were observed. The treatment protocol facilitated early functional rehabilitation, as evidenced by a progressive and statistically significant improvement in Cooney scores: from 74.5 ± 10.7 at 3 weeks to 87.5 ± 7.2 at 6 weeks, 93.5 ± 4.5 at 3 months, and 96.8 ± 2.7 by 6 months postoperatively ( Conclusion: The modified external fixation technique for pediatric DRMDJ fractures enables early functional rehabilitation and a quicker return to school activities, while obviating the need for secondary hardware removal surgery. This approach adheres to minimally invasive principles and cosmetic acceptability, positioning it as an effective therapeutic strategy for treating pediatric DRMDJ fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.