ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Machine learning model for predicting urinary tract infection risk in febrile children under 3 years of age.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common childhood infectious disease. Accurate prediction of UTI risk in febrile children enables timely intervention and helps avoid long-term complications such as renal scarring. Methods: 1,556 cases of febrile children under 3 years of age were retrospectively analyzed, and feature variables were screened using LASSO regression. Seven machine learning (ML) algorithms, including Random Forest, were used to construct the UTI prediction model. The model performance was evaluated based on comprehensive indices, including area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis, from which the optimal prediction model was selected. The SHAP method was applied to analyze the decision-making mechanism of the model. Results: Among the seven ML models, Random Forest performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.88 in the test set, an AUPRC of 0.824, optimal calibration (ICI = 0.12), and decision curve analysis showed superior performance compared to other ML algorithms. Through LASSO regression screening and SHAP analysis, seven core predictors were established: age, WBC count, previous UTI episodes, PLT, fever peak, CRP, prenatally detected renal abnormalities. These key indicators helped to construct an accurate prediction system for UTI risk in febrile children. Conclusions: The ML model constructed in this study can accurately predict UTI risk in febrile children under 3 years of age. The visual decision interpretation achieved through the SHAP framework can assist clinicians in quickly identifying high-risk children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.