Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438448›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025

An

Sarathi Pathik Vin, Shishir H Singh, Rajesh S Podar, Gaurav P Kulkarni, Ameya M Lokhande, Swapnil Vijay Chandekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarathi Pathik VinDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, T.P.C.T's Terna Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Shishir H SinghDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, T.P.C.T's Terna Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Rajesh S PodarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, T.P.C.T's Terna Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Gaurav P KulkarniDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, T.P.C.T's Terna Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Ameya M LokhandeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, T.P.C.T's Terna Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Swapnil Vijay ChandekarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, T.P.C.T's Terna Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Hermetic seal between gutta-percha and dentin is created by endodontic sealers. Sonic or ultrasonic activation (UA) of sealers may improve their penetration into tubules and strength, which could be evaluated by testing the bond at dentine-obturation interface. Aims: To compare and evaluate the effect of ultrasonic and sonic activation on push-out bond strength of three different endodontic sealers, namely AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, and Endosequence BC. Settings and Design: An experimental Methodology: Ninety extracted human premolars were decoronated to 16 mm and instrumented with ProTaper Gold to size F3. Samples were grouped based on three sealers - AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, and Endosequence BC Sealer and further subdivided by ultrasonic, sonic, and no activation of sealers followed by lateral compaction obturation. Filled roots were sliced into 2 mm discs from each third. A Universal Testing Machine was used to measure pushout bond strength (POBS). Statistical Analysis Used: Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance/One-way ANNOVA; and Results: Ultrasonic and sonic activation enhanced bond strength, significantly in the AH Plus and MTA Fillapex groups, with the coronal third showing greatest improvements. AH Plus consistently demonstrated superior bond strength, followed by Endosequence BC, and finally MTA Fillapex. No significant change in bond strength of Endosequence BC post activation. Conclusions: Among the tested materials, AH Plus demonstrated the greatest bond strength, with UA notably enhancing coronal bonding, while activation showed minimal impact in the apical third across all sealers.

Indexed as

AH plusendosequence BC sealerMTA fillapexpush-out bond strengthsealer activationsonic activationultrasonic activation

Identifiers

PMID41438448
PMCPMC12721424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.