ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Incidence of restoration failure and its etiology: A retrospective study.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vitro evaluation of a novel self-adhesive composite primer modified with nano zinc oxide and hydroxyapatite: antibacterial activity, marginal microleakage, and interfacial elemental analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Getting your publication right - Part 2 - Structuring a research manuscript: A guide to writing a case report.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Review
- Long-Term Clinical Performance of Posterior Composite Restorations After Nearly Three Decades: A Clinical Follow-Up Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Restorative dentistry plays a critical role in maintaining oral health, function, and esthetics by repairing damaged or decayed teeth. Restoration failures can arise from several factors, such as material degradation, improper technique, patient-specific oral conditions. Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the incidence of restoration failure among different permanent restorative materials and to analyze the causes of restoration failure. Materials and Methods: Four-hundred patients were examined for restoration failure over a time period of 19 months, reported at the outpatient section of the department of conservative dentistry and endodontics. A self-structured pro forma was designed, and each patient was given a code number. The details about the patient and causes of failure of permanent restorations were obtained by using a questionnaire which included information on patient's oral hygiene habits and history of restoration placement. Statistical Analysis: Data obtained were statistically analyzed by the Chi-square test. Result and Conclusion: Statistically significant differences (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.