ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2026
Long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of the Acellular Tissue Engineered Vessel (ATEV) in extremity arterial trauma repair.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering function in lung biology: integrating imaging, regenerative constructs, and functional biodesign.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In cases of arterial injury, use of autologous vein for arterial repair is sometimes not feasible. We previously reported the short-term (ie, 30-day) outcomes of the Acellular Tissue Engineered Vessel (Symvess) in treating extremity vascular injuries. This study evaluates the long-term safety, efficacy, and mechanical durability of Symvess in patients with arterial trauma. Methods: This prospective analysis focused on patients from the CLN-PRO-V005 clinical study who sustained noniatrogenic vascular injuries to the extremities, and for whom saphenous vein was not feasible for use. Patients received Symvess and were followed for up to 36 months. Primary outcomes include graft patency, limb salvage, adverse events, and mechanical durability, as assessed through clinical evaluation, imaging, and independent adjudication. Long-term patency, limb salvage, patient survival and infection rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: This study evaluated 54 patients who underwent extremity vascular repair with Symvess and were followed for up to 36 months. Mechanisms of injury were primarily penetrating (57%) or blast-related. Follow-up ranged from 1 day to 42 months (median, 10.7 months), totaling 59.5 patient-years. Primary patency was 58.3%, and secondary patency was 65.7% at month 12; limb salvage at month 12 was 87.3%. Infection-free rates remained at 92.9% from months 3 through 36, with no infections after day 37. All deaths (n = 6; 11.1%) occurred within the first 6 months. No deaths or amputations were attributed to the Symvess conduit. Adverse events and serious adverse events declined over time, and no cases of immune-mediated rejection were observed. There were no cases of unprovoked, spontaneous Symvess rupture or mechanical failure. Conclusions: Symvess use for arterial reconstruction in setting of limb threatening arterial injury is associated with low infection rates, and acceptable limb salvage outcomes over 36 months in a high-risk trauma population when use of saphenous vein was not feasible. These results suggest Symvess represents a new alternative when autologous vein is not feasible for arterial reconstruction in extremity trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.