ArticleMethodsX2025
Interpretable deep learning for depression detection in neurological patients using EEG signals.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Temporal Deep Learning for EEG-Based Depression Detection Using Resting-State Brain Dynamics.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026Article
- QuantumNeuroXAI: a quantum-inspired deep learning framework with explainability for brain signal analysis and neurological disorder detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression affects over 280 million people worldwide, with neurological patients particularly prone to medication-induced episodes. Conventional diagnostic approaches rely on subjective evaluations, limiting reproducibility and consistency in clinical settings. This study proposes an interpretable deep learning framework for objective depression detection using EEG signals. We hypothesize that combining EEG-based features with explainable artificial intelligence can provide both high accuracy and transparency in diagnosis. The model was trained on EEG data from 232 neurological patients, achieving 98 % classification accuracy. Interpretability was enhanced through SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis, which identified clinically meaningful EEG biomarkers such as the delta/alpha ratio and theta band power. This paper highlights the following contributions: Integration of EEG features with a lightweight deep learning model for depression detection High diagnostic accuracy achieved while maintaining interpretability for clinicians An objective tool that is compatible with existing EEG infrastructure, supporting clinical adoption These results show that our framework bridges predictive performance with interpretability, offering a transparent and scalable EEG-based diagnostic tool. We conclude that this approach can complement clinical decision-making, reducing dependence on subjective evaluation and enabling more consistent, data-driven mental health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.