Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438403›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Interpretable deep learning for depression detection in neurological patients using EEG signals.

Parisa Khaleghi, Duygu Cakir, Ali Hamidoğlu, Omer Melih Gul, Seifedine Kadry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parisa KhaleghiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Bahçeşehir University, Turkey.
Duygu CakirSoftware Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Bahçeşehir University, Turkey.
Ali HamidoğluInterdisciplinary Lab for Mathematical Ecology and Epidemiology (ILMEE) & Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Omer Melih GulInformatics Institute, Istanbul Technical University 34469, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey.
Seifedine KadryDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression affects over 280 million people worldwide, with neurological patients particularly prone to medication-induced episodes. Conventional diagnostic approaches rely on subjective evaluations, limiting reproducibility and consistency in clinical settings. This study proposes an interpretable deep learning framework for objective depression detection using EEG signals. We hypothesize that combining EEG-based features with explainable artificial intelligence can provide both high accuracy and transparency in diagnosis. The model was trained on EEG data from 232 neurological patients, achieving 98 % classification accuracy. Interpretability was enhanced through SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis, which identified clinically meaningful EEG biomarkers such as the delta/alpha ratio and theta band power. This paper highlights the following contributions: Integration of EEG features with a lightweight deep learning model for depression detection High diagnostic accuracy achieved while maintaining interpretability for clinicians An objective tool that is compatible with existing EEG infrastructure, supporting clinical adoption These results show that our framework bridges predictive performance with interpretability, offering a transparent and scalable EEG-based diagnostic tool. We conclude that this approach can complement clinical decision-making, reducing dependence on subjective evaluation and enabling more consistent, data-driven mental health care.

Indexed as

Depression detectionEEG biomarkersElectroencephalographyExplainable artificial intelligenceSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID41438403
PMCPMC12720302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.