Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438393›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026

Acute pulmonary vasoreactivity: a simple test revisited in the contemporary era - a narrative review.

Juan C Grignola, Pedro Trujillo, Julio Sandoval, Enric Domingo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan C GrignolaPathophysiology Academic Unit, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Pedro TrujilloCentro Cardiovascular Universitario, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Julio SandovalIgnacio Chavez National Institute of Cardiology of México, Mexico.
Enric DomingoArea del Cor, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acute vasodilator challenge during right heart catheterization (RHC) provides a deeper understanding of the pulmonary circulation by assessing vasoreactivity. The current criteria for a positive acute vasoreactivity test (AVT) are simplified to steady-state metrics, based on cutoff points derived from expert opinion. A positive AVT identifies a specific, but very rare, PH phenotype that may respond long-term to calcium-channel blockers. Growing evidence supports updating the role and criteria of AVT in pulmonary arterial hypertension, broadening its use to other PH groups, and potentially offering new insights for predicting risk and/or treatment outcomes. This study aims to revisit the uses, criteria, and goals of AVT in patients with PH beyond group 1 and to propose a new approach for phenotyping the pulmonary vascular response to the acute vasodilator challenge during diagnostic RHC. We propose a continuous multi-parameter criterion to evaluate the entire right ventricular afterload during AVT, such as the pulmonary vascular resistance-pulmonary arterial capacitance curve and alpha distensibility coefficient. AVT could assess the residual vasoreactive reserve of the pulmonary circulation as a provocative test for predicting risk outcomes and/or treatment responses.

Indexed as

Acute vasoreactivity testingPulmonary hypertensionPulmonary vascular resistance-pulmonary arterial capacitance relationshipPulmonary vasoreactivity

Identifiers

PMID41438393
PMCPMC12719676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.