ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
A contribution-interpretable belief rule base model for obesity risk prediction using physical indicators and dietary habits.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Obesity is a pressing global endocrine disorder that disrupts hormonal axes and elevates the risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic conditions. Early and reliable risk prediction is crucial for timely intervention, yet most existing models fail to balance predictive accuracy with interpretability, limiting their clinical applicability. Methods: We propose a dual-layer belief rule base model with hybrid evolutionary optimization and contribution analysis (DBRB-C) for multilevel obesity risk prediction. The framework integrates data-driven learning with knowledge-based reasoning through a hierarchical architecture, employs a differential evolution-particle swarm optimization strategy for parameter learning, and introduces a contribution belief matrix with reverse contribution analysis to trace decision-making pathways. Results: Evaluated on real-world datasets from Latin America and Turkey, DBRB-C achieved higher accuracy and stability than conventional machine-learning models. The model explicitly identified modifiable dietary behaviors-such as vegetable consumption frequency and number of daily meals-as key determinants of obesity risk, while providing fully traceable reasoning for each prediction. Discussion: The DBRB-C model successfully bridges the gap between accuracy and interpretability in obesity risk assessment. Its transparent, contribution-aware architecture offers a reliable foundation for personalized lifestyle interventions and supports evidence-based clinical decision-making in endocrinology and preventive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.